Home/Product/Product Roadmap
Product
intermediate📖 7 min read

Product Roadmap

Also known as: RoadmapProduct StrategyFeature RoadmapRelease PlanProduct Planning

💡The Concept

A product roadmap is a strategic document that communicates the WHY and WHAT of your product direction over time — not just a feature list. The best roadmaps are organized by outcomes (problems to solve), not outputs (features to ship). Research shows that outcome-driven roadmaps lead to 30-40% higher feature adoption rates because teams focus on customer impact rather than shipping for shipping's sake.

⚠️The Trap

The deadliest roadmap trap is treating it as a promise. 73% of product managers report that stakeholders treat the roadmap as a binding commitment, leading to 'feature factory' mode where teams ship on schedule but solve nothing. Another trap: roadmaps longer than 3 months become fiction — market conditions, customer feedback, and competitive moves invalidate long-term plans within weeks. LinkedIn found that 60% of roadmap items planned 6+ months out were either cancelled or fundamentally changed by the time their quarter arrived.

🎯The Action

Build a Now/Next/Later roadmap: 'Now' (this sprint — committed, detailed), 'Next' (next 4-8 weeks — planned, flexible), 'Later' (3-6 months — directional themes only). For each item, state the problem being solved AND the success metric. Review and reprioritize the roadmap every 2 weeks. Limit 'Now' to 3 items maximum — if everything is a priority, nothing is.

Pro Tips

#1

The best roadmap question is 'What problem does this solve, and for how many customers?' If a PM can't answer both parts with data, the feature isn't ready for the roadmap.

#2

Add a 'Parking Lot' section for good ideas you're saying 'not now' to — this validates the request while keeping focus. Revisit parking lot items quarterly.

#3

Share your roadmap with 5 customers before committing. If they react with 'that's nice' instead of 'I NEED that,' you're building the wrong things.

🚫Common Myths

Myth: “A good roadmap has specific dates for every feature

Reality: Dates create deadline-driven development where teams cut quality to hit dates. Spotify stopped using date-based roadmaps in 2014 and saw team satisfaction increase 35% while shipping velocity actually improved — teams focused on impact, not calendar anxiety.

Myth: “The roadmap should include everything customers request

Reality: If you build everything customers ask for, you'll build what they need today, not what they'll need tomorrow. Steve Jobs: 'People don't know what they want until you show it to them.' Use customer requests as problem signals, not feature specifications.

📊Real-World Case Studies

💬

Slack

2013-2015

success

Slack's early roadmap was famously outcome-driven: every feature had to improve one of three metrics — messages sent per user, teams onboarded per week, or daily active users. When the team proposed building video calling, Stewart Butterfield vetoed it because the data showed messaging volume was the #1 predictor of retention. They delayed video calling by 2 years and focused on making messaging addictive — channels, search, integrations. The result: Slack grew from 0 to $100M ARR in 2.5 years.

Time to $100M ARR

2.5 years

Roadmap Focus Areas

3 metrics only

Features Delayed/Killed

40%+

DAU at $100M ARR

1M+

💡 Lesson: Slack's discipline in saying 'not now' to good features (video, voice, threading) in favor of great metrics-moving features (search, channels, integrations) is the gold standard of outcome-driven roadmapping.

🐘

Evernote

2014-2018

failure

Evernote expanded their roadmap to include physical products (Evernote-branded bags, scanners), a food app (Evernote Food), a contacts app, and work chat — all while their core note-taking product stagnated. Their CEO admitted they had 'too many products and too little focus.' Premium user growth flatlined at 5% while costs ballooned. They eventually shut down 5 products and laid off 15% of staff.

Products Launched

5+ side products

Core Product Improvement

Minimal

Premium Growth

Flatlined at 5%

Staff Layoffs

15% (2015)

💡 Lesson: When your roadmap diversifies away from your core value proposition, you dilute engineering resources across too many surfaces. Evernote tried to be 'the workspace for everything' instead of 'the best note-taking tool.' Focused roadmaps win.

🎮Decision Scenario: The Roadmap Crisis

You're VP of Product at a B2B SaaS with $5M ARR. The engineering team has capacity for 2 major projects per quarter. You have 6 competing priorities from sales, CS, executive team, and your own product vision.

ARR

$5M

Monthly Churn

4.2%

NPS Score

32

Engineering Capacity

2 major projects/quarter

Decision 1

It's Q1 planning. Sales wants CRM integration (predicted $800K pipeline). CS wants a help center and better onboarding (churn data shows 40% of churned users never completed onboarding). The CEO wants a mobile app because '3 prospects asked for it.' Your data shows the onboarding problem is the root cause of both churn AND low NPS.

Build the CRM integration and mobile app — they have revenue and executive backingClick to reveal →
The CRM integration takes 8 weeks and closes 2 deals worth $120K total (not the $800K predicted — sales forecasts are typically 4-5x optimistic for feature-gated deals). The mobile app launches but only 3% of users adopt it. Churn stays at 4.2%. You shipped features with executive support but didn't move your worst metric.
ARR: +$120K → $5.12MChurn: 4.2% → 4.2% (unchanged)NPS: 32 → 33 (barely moved)
Prioritize onboarding overhaul + help center — fix the root cause of churn and low NPSClick to reveal →
The onboarding wizard reduces time-to-value from 14 days to 3 days. Onboarding completion jumps from 60% to 85%. Monthly churn drops from 4.2% to 3.1% within 2 months. NPS rises to 41. You pushed back on sales and the CEO, but your metrics proved the strategy right.
Churn: 4.2% → 3.1%NPS: 32 → 41Onboarding Completion: 60% → 85%

Decision 2

It's Q2. Your churn improvement saved $440K in annual revenue that would have been lost. The CEO is impressed. Now Sales returns: the CRM integration is still needed (pipeline is real this time — 5 signed LOIs worth $600K conditional on the integration). Engineering says they can do the CRM integration AND one more project.

Build the CRM integration (now backed by signed LOIs) and start the mobile appClick to reveal →
The CRM integration ships and 4 of 5 LOIs convert ($480K new ARR). But the mobile app again sees low adoption (5%) because your product is a workflow tool — users work at desks, not on phones. You've wasted 50% of engineering capacity on low-impact work.
ARR: +$480K → $5.92MMobile Adoption: 5% (low impact)
Build the CRM integration (revenue is validated) and invest the second slot in advanced analytics your power users are requestingClick to reveal →
Correct. CRM ships ($480K from LOIs). The analytics feature drives 22% more engagement from power users and becomes your #1 upsell feature. NRR jumps to 108% as existing customers upgrade for analytics. You've balanced revenue-backed requests with product-led growth.
ARR: +$480K from CRM + expansionNRR: 100% → 108%
🧪

Scenario Challenge

You're a PM at a B2B SaaS company. Your top enterprise customer ($200K ARR) threatens to churn unless you build a custom SSO integration within 60 days. Meanwhile, your data shows 150 SMB customers (total $300K ARR) are churning because of slow onboarding — a problem your roadmap's top priority (self-serve onboarding wizard) would fix in 45 days. The engineering team can only do one.

Related Concepts

Turn knowledge into action

Try our free calculators to apply these concepts with your own numbers.

Try the Calculators →